Tree of Life

12 May

Pens Sweep? By Ken Laird

published in category: Pittsburgh Penguins, Pittsburgh Pirates on Thursday, May 12th, 2016 – 8:47 am

There are several easy comparisons to be made between this year’s Penguins team and Pittsburgh’s 2009 title team, led by the mid-season coaching changes in each of those seasons and the two rivalry series (Philadelphia and Washington in 2009, the Rangers and Washington in 2016) that began playoff runs.

So if these two seasons appear headed down similar paths, will Penguins vs. Tampa play out in similar fashion to the 2009 sweep of the Carolina Hurricanes in the Eastern Conference Finals?

511pens16

Let’s look back.

The 2009 matchup of Pittsburgh and Carolina had a few storylines, but not many (it was the first ever playoff meeting between the franchises):

-It featured Jordan Staal playing against his older brother Eric (the first meeting of brothers in a conference final since the Esposito’s in the mid 1970s)

-Carolina fans hated Brooks Orpik for a hit on Erik Cole which broke a vertebrae in his neck

-Former Pens Ron Francis and Tom Barrasso were behind the Carolina bench

-And former Steelers coach Bill Cowher had been sounding hurricane alarms to rile up fans in two previous Game 3’s in Raleigh.

The 2016 storylines for Pens and Lightning? Again, limited storylines. The two teams have played once before in the postseason, but it’s not a thrilling revenge epic: that was a seven-game series in 2011 where the depleted Penguins (the ‘replace-Pens’) blew a 3-1 first round series lead. You have the Victor Hedman check on Sidney Crosby that doubled up a concussion and the promise of a series matching the two fastest teams in the East as probably the top storylines leading the way.

The 2009 ECF pitted the number four seed vs. the number six seed in terms of Eastern Conference standings that year, so it was anti-climactic from the start, even if Carolina had been a Cup winner in 2006 (they had missed the playoffs both years afterward).

Here in 2016, technically Tampa is the again a six-seed opponent based on regular season points, although the comparison is not quite apples to apples thanks to the change in division and playoff format. Pittsburgh is technically the two seed, but as in 2009 it’s a pair of non-division champions meeting for a shot at the Prince of Wales Trophy so I’ll call that comparison a good one.

Both series share the thread of elite goaltending matchups, in somewhat unexpected ways.

In 2009, Carolina’s Cam Ward, at age 25, was thought of as the best goalie remaining in the playoffs with a Cup win on his resume, winning two Game 7’s (against Marty Brodeur and Tim Thomas in rounds one and two), and setting a career high with 39 regular-season wins. Marc-Andre Fleury, of course, had his doubters but was coming off elite play against the Capitals with a signature save on Alex Ovechkin in a Game 7.

This year, Tampa is riding 29-year-old Ben Bishop, a Vezina Trophy nominee but a somewhat unheralded superstar (the guy has allowed just one total goal in five clinching postseason games over the past two years). Pittsburgh has rookie Matt Murray at age 21 coming off series where he outplayed Henrik Lundqvist and Braden Holtby.

But I think both 2009 and 2016 have enough juice to qualify as big-time goalie matchups.

506pens

Eric Staal was a superstar in 2009, with nine goals combined in rounds one and two that year, and Sidney Crosby had 12 goals and 21 points already in the bank by the time the Eastern finals started. This year, Crosby has been much tamer (three goals, 10 points), while Tampa is missing its’ big star Steven Stamkos due to his blood clot issue. Tyler Johnson and Nikita Kucherov lead the way for Tampa in points this year, and while Kucherov’s nine tallies are impressive it’s hard to think of him as a superstar yet (although he’s getting there).

Tampa appears more built on quality depth, as Carolina was in 2009; Jussi Jokinen, Rod Brind’Amour, Ray Whitney, Matt Cullen and the like dotted the ‘Canes roster while this Tampa squad has the same scrappy veterans like Ryan Callahan, Brian Boyle, and Val Filppula.

So the roster makeups have some similarities.

Tampa’s coach, Jon Cooper, has done a remarkable job since taking over for Guy Boucher in 2013, with a trip the Cup Finals last year an impressive achievement. Carolina’s coach in 2009 was 42-year-old Paul Maurice, who took over an underachieving team December of that season and orchestrated a 33-19-5 turnaround. Maurice had been a coach with Hartford 10-years prior and lost in a Cup Final with Carolina in 2002 before Jim Rutherford fired him (Peter Laviolette coached the winning Carolina Cup team).

In short, I’m not sure the coaching storyline is very similar; Cooper has been entrenched for a while in Tampa while Maurice was a Mike Sullivan-esque transient.

511sullivan

Another difference, Carolina was a very disciplined team in 2009 with the fewest number of penalties taken in the regular season and the second-best PK in the playoffs. Tampa has taken 59 minors in the playoffs so far this year, the league’s highest total. And while the Penguins’ power play isn’t quite as elite as 2009 (13 power play goals in the first two rounds to 11 this year) it’s pretty close and it could be a big advantage for Pittsburgh in the series.

And finally, maybe the biggest difference, this Tampa team has finished its’ first two series in just five games (Detroit and the Islanders), while the 2009 Carolina team may have hit a wall after two seven-game series.

To summarize, there are some similar vibes this year to the 2009 Eastern Finals to be sure: the Penguins are favored against a team they don’t know very well after navigating two emotional series in rounds one and two, but their ECF opponent is not to be overlooked again with respectable recent playoff success to their credit.

The 2009 Penguins went on to blitz that Carolina team with scores of 3-2 (Fleury was excellent, Phillipe Boucher had the game winner), 7-4 (the Malkin hat-trick game, including his ridiculous around-the-net backhand roof job that ended a string of four ties and two lead changes in the contest), 6-2 and 4-1 to snub Cowher in Raleigh.

It’s awful hard to predict a sweep, but home wins by Pittsburgh in Games 1 and 2 will bring back those memories. Game 1 Friday night will be huge, as Tampa tries to send a message that this won’t be a 2009 repeat, this will be a series that lasts.

512pens2

Posted in Pittsburgh Penguins, Pittsburgh Pirates

 

11 May

Pens clinch in OT

published in category: Pittsburgh Penguins on Wednesday, May 11th, 2016 – 12:43 pm

Pens win in OT to clinch series and move on to the Conference Finals. Tim Benz interviews series hero Matt Murray and Kris Letang after the game. Sullivan on the team coming together as a team. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE TEAM SPANOS GROUP OF RAYMOND JAMES. RECENTLY HIGHLIGHTED AS THE FACE OF FINANCIAL GUIDANCE IN PITTSBURGH MAGAZINE.

511pens16

Rob Rossi with Guy Junker, Ken Laird and Tim Benz on Pens being Cup contenders, giving Jim Rutherford credit for putting this team together.

511pens3

Capitals fan Justin LaBar joins Ken Laird, Guy Junker and Tim Benz in-studio to talk about the highs and lows to the season, the series and Game 6. Washington sports fans in misery.

511sullivan

Posted in Pittsburgh Penguins

 

11 May

Pens’ Third Line Steals The Show vs. Caps, by Josh Taylor

published in category: Pittsburgh Penguins on Wednesday, May 11th, 2016 – 2:33 am

hagelin game 6

You may not think they’re cute or know they’re sexy, and with those playoff beards, they probably don’t have the looks that drive the girls wild right about now.

But in the marquee series of the Stanley Cup Playoffs between the Pittsburgh Penguins and the Washington Capitals, one where the stars were expected to shine the brightest, the group that sent chills up and down the spines of the crowd was the Penguins’ trio of Carl Hagelin, Nick Bonino and Phil Kessel — otherwise known as the “HBK” line.

Those three men were big enough show-stoppers to make even the first man to own the “HBK” moniker — WWE wrestling Hall of Famer Shawn Michaels — stand and applaud. But the praise they received from their head coach was much simpler, yet based on high merit.

“That line as a whole is a really good line,” Mike Sullivan said in his post-game press conference. “I think they present a good matchup challenge when that type of situation presents itself. I can’t say enough about that line.”

The challenge provided by the Penguins’ third line was one the Capitals failed to answer, surrendering a combined total of seven goals and 11 assists. Each of them tallied at least one goal in the series finale (Kessel scored the first two of the game), and Bonino’s game-winner at 6:32 of the overtime period helped the team advance to their fourth Eastern Conference Final in the Sidney Crosby/Evgeni Malkin era.

“We had a good start to the series and we were quiet the last couple games,” Bonino said. “We wanted to come out tonight and play hard. Phil plays well in big games, and the same with Haggy. To be able to get some goals from us, we’re happy with that and to ultimately get the win.”

Kessel aside, Bonino and Hagelin aren’t well-known for their scoring ability. But each of the three brings a specific skill set that complements the others and helps them make a significant impact at both ends of the ice.

“Haggy brings so much speed,” Sullivan said. “Phil is such a threat to score from anywhere on the rink. Bones is the guy that I think is the glue guy on that line with how he reads plays and makes plays offensively, but also provides a defensive conscience to that line because he’s so sound in his own end zone.”

The construction of this line is significant for two reasons: all three players were acquired in trades made by general manager Jim Rutherford, and they are emblematic of the entire roster’s makeup.

“It shows the depth of our team,” Bonino said. “We’ve had it all year. Not as even scoring with Sid and Geno, but the line was chipping in at the right time, and that’s the playoffs.

“We’re playing a team next that is going to have a lot of depth scoring. We’ve got to be able to match that.”

That team is the Tampa Bay Lightning, appearing in the conference final for the second straight year and built in the same fashion as the Pens the previous postseason. And the Penguins aren’t taking them lightly, despite knocking off the East’s top seed and the President’s Trophy winner in Washington.

“If you play this late in the year, you’re going to have adversity and you have to overcome it,” Bonino said. “We play Tampa next, and they’ve done the same thing. They’re playing without two or three of their best players, and it’s going to be a good series.”

It won’t be an easy series to win, but whether not the Penguins advance to their fourth Stanley Cup Final in franchise history could depend on just how well their show-stoppers continue to play.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Pittsburgh Penguins

 

10 May

Re-evaluating Walker-Neise Trade

published in category: Pittsburgh Pirates on Tuesday, May 10th, 2016 – 4:10 pm

PIA Pittsburgh and Babcock Beer presents Pirates-Reds Pre-Game-looking at the Neise-Neil Walker trade. Batting Order and line-up change.

510pir

Posted in Pittsburgh Pirates

 

10 May

WWE RAW Recap

published in category: Wrestling Reality on Tuesday, May 10th, 2016 – 2:18 pm


Posted in Wrestling Reality

 

10 May

Game 6 Preview

published in category: Pittsburgh Penguins on Tuesday, May 10th, 2016 – 1:33 pm

Former Penguin and now NHL Radio Host Matthew Barnaby joins Tim Benz and Guy Junker to talk about the Pens-Caps series and the Stanley Cup Playoffs.

510cros

Tim Benz previews the game with Trevor Daley plus Caps Play-by-Play Man Joe Beninati joins Benz, Ken Laird and Josh Taylor to preview the game.

506crosby

Hornqvist and Sullivan both talk about his mystery benching? Pirates lose to Reds. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE TEAM SPANOS GROUP OF RAYMOND JAMES. RECENTLY HIGHLIGHTED AS THE FACE OF FINANCIAL GUIDANCE IN PITTSBURGH MAGAZINE.

Posted in Pittsburgh Penguins

 

10 May

Final Ike Taylor Show

published in category: Pittsburgh Steelers on Tuesday, May 10th, 2016 – 10:23 am

This is the Farewell Edition of the Ike Taylor Show, Ike is moving on to do even more work at the NFL Network. Talking about his favorite memories from the show.

ike-2

Posted in Pittsburgh Steelers

 

10 May

Why Bench Horny? by Tim Benz

published in category: Pittsburgh Penguins on Tuesday, May 10th, 2016 – 8:30 am

In order for you to continue reading this column, you are going to have to do what I did in order to finish writing it.

We are going to have to suspend our disbelief of the inference that Patric Hornqvist is really healthy.

He says he is. Mike Sullivan says he is. But this is hockey. And it’s deep into the playoffs. So when it comes to matters of health, players and coaches often…how can I put this delicately…turn into filthy liars.

That seems delicate.

But both player and coach are selling this one pretty hard. Hornqvist laughed at a suggestion he was hurt when one was advanced by a reporter Monday. And Sullivan dismissed that idea too after he limited Hornqvist to just two shifts in the third period in Saturday’s 3-1 Game 5 loss in Washington.

“We just shortened our bench,” the head coach stated. “We were trying to climb back in it. So we went with the guys we thought were going and had some energy. So we tweaked the lines a little bit”

How’s that suspension of disbelief coming?

Yeah, me either.

The only reason I’m partially willing to believe that Sullivan did bench the Game Four hero and team goal scoring leader in the playoffs is how the two discussed the matter Monday.

509sullivan

“No (health issues). Not at all,” scoffed Hornqvist. “I didn’t have my best game and that’s what happens. I didn’t win enough pucks along the walls and I didn’t take it to the net like I can. Some nights you don’t have it. And that happened. And I have to be better tomorrow (in game 6). And I will.”

Granted, Hornqvist wasn’t great Saturday. He was pointless. And his CF was a subpar 46%. But that hardly seemed “bench worthy” for a guy that was spoken about as if he was a folk hero by Sullivan Thursday night after his OT game winner.

“Love him,” beamed Sullivan on Thursday. “We love what he brings. He makes everyone on every line better. To see him get rewarded like that in OT…it’s a thrill.”

But those verbal bouquets continued to be hurled by Sullivan towards “Horny” Monday. And he did it in a love-tap-on-the-head-way that seemed remarkably reminiscent of platitudes he tossed at Marc Andre Fleury and Olli Maatta as those two have had to deal with “bench or play” situations this postseason.

“Horny is a great pro. And he is harder on himself than anyone is on him. He is a warrior of a player. And he has done so much for this team,” gushed Sullivan after practice. “Because he is a great pro, he’s one guy who really takes ownership of his game. And we love that about him. And he’s going to be a big part of this thing moving forward.”

That’s a long way to go for something that could’ve been simply dismissed as saying: “He had a minor upper/lower body injury. He’ll be fine to play Tuesday.”

Hornqvist’s practice participation Monday certainly suggests that’ll be the case.

So then why do it? Why bench a guy who has been a blood and guts player since he got to Pittsburgh last year. While Hornqvist’s production may come and go like many players, his effort is never in question. And when you are desperate to catch up in the third period, why not keep the guy on the ice who is the most likely to bang in a loose rebound near the cage?

“We were down a couple of goals. We were looking at players who had the most energy. That had juice. That we thought were going. That gave us a opportunity to have a spark,” claimed Sullivan Monday

That’s the first time I’ve heard “Horny” and not “having a spark” suggested together since he arrived in Pittsburgh. That’s not exactly the reputation he’s built up around these parts. And maybe too much is being made about Hornqvist “not having it” on the same night where Chris Kunitz clearly did. Those are two guys who provide a lot of similar qualities. But Hornqvist has been doing it better this year.

Saturday though, Kunitz was having his best game of the post season. He scored his first goal. Had his highest SOG total (4). His CF% was a team best 81%. And by extension, the Honey Badger received his most ice time.

Hence, Hornqvist sacrificing a little ice to Kunitz could be understood, especially on the power play. But his even ice total (9:14) was rivaling that of Tom Kuhnackl’s (7:33). Something is wrong there.

The narrative these days in Pittsburgh is “In Sully We Trust.” Ok. So I guess we will on this matter too. But the method to his madness on benching Hornqvist is very much in question.

He’s either gone mad for benching him. Or he’s taking the hiding of injuries to a maddening level.

Suspend whichever belief or disbelief you like.

510horn

Posted in Pittsburgh Penguins

 



Podcasts